Please expand.Ryoung122 (talk) 03:02, December 29, 2015 (UTC)

Could the GRG Table F be of use here? http://www.grg.org/Adams/F.HTM Richard Monkey (talk) 08:51, December 29, 2015 (UTC)


Let's Table-ize this list

It's a good start with a bullet list, but it would be better to table-ize this list.Ryoung122 (talk) 01:16, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

I'll give it a go. And what do you think of my question? Richard Monkey (talk) 07:19, December 30, 2015 (UTC)

Table needs

Please add a column for claimed date of birth, date of death (or still living).Ryoung122 (talk) 01:47, December 31, 2015 (UTC)

Sorting

How should this table be sorted? By name? By claimed age? — AMK152 (Wall • Contrib) 02:38, December 31, 2015 (UTC)

  • I would advocate sorting the table by claimed age. --Jim1997 (talk) 03:57, December 31, 2015 (UTC)


This page is very important

This page may be a work in progress, but it is very important...it demonstrates the need for age validation of supercentenarian claims.

Thus, we need to focus on continuing to improve and expand this page. That should include exact claimed dates of birth and death and age claimed, where possible. It also needs to use citations to indicate both where the age claim came from and also where the debunking came from.Ryoung122 (talk) 04:17, January 2, 2016 (UTC)

New category

If I can ask, what are you think that we add new "category" on this page, Debunked by, like on Table F.StefanSeto (talk) 15:48, January 7, 2016 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.