Thread:Richard Monkey/@comment-258494-20180201075357

I'm not happy with your unilateral plan to move many cases to "questionable" lists without so much as discussing the issue first or defining what standards are being used to decide to separate some cases from others.

It's not enough for you to have an opinion...your opinion is Original Research and that's a violation of the No Original Research rule.

What matters are facts and sources. What sources do you have to back up an assertion of "questionable" status?

You need to stop and then discuss this before continuing onward.Ryoung122 (talk) 07:53, February 1, 2018 (UTC) 