Thread:930310JL/@comment-258494-20161205020851/@comment-258494-20161207180253

930310JL wrote: Ryoung122 wrote: 930310JL wrote: There's no need for personal attacks. This isn't a personal attack. I didn't make an ad hominem statement. I did lay out that your viewpoint on "unverified" supercentenarians did not align with the Gerontology Wiki viewpoint.Ryoung122 (talk) 16:38, December 7, 2016 (UTC) You clearly said something based on an unproven assumption of yours in an effort to belittle me. Can you say something positive once in a while, or is that too difficult for you?Ryoung122 (talk) 18:02, December 7, 2016 (UTC)