Talk:Signe Hoejer/@comment-33034960-20180408200812/@comment-33034960-20180409212259

Mihael7, as I know, some once-vandalized articles have never been protected, but some non-vandalized are (were) protected from the beginning of creation. (Admins, please correct me if I am wrong).

However (if we focus, say, on sc biographies): any article can be vandalized. This, at least in the theoretical sense, means that all articles will be protected over time. Unfortunately, vandals are and will always be present.

What then is the purpose of the so-called gerontological online encyclopedia, which any registered user can edit? How to edit (improve) such protected articles? Do we, registered users, have to write comments under every of the protected sc biographies in a way of requesting admins for editing / adding new information to the articles? I think that "comments" are not intended for this purpose. Plus, the requests have already been (I believe, non-intentionally) ignored by admins.

How to solve this problem?