Talk:Oldest Validated supercentenarians All-Time/@comment-258494-20160204204034/@comment-258494-20160208180521

Yes, that's a potential problem: should we do these lists by top 100, 101-200, 201-300, etc.?

Or by age...114+, 113, 112, 111, 110...

I think we should set up test templates first, to see what the maximum practical list length is before the template becomes a problem.

Another question: what happens if there's no template at all? Please make some test-page options.

Ryoung122 (talk) 18:05, February 8, 2016 (UTC)