Thread:930310JL/@comment-258494-20170414161748/@comment-26393720-20170415184013

Ryoung122 wrote: 930310JL wrote: It is if the information is subject to rapid change. This is an example of the GRG being the sole recognized authority regarding longevity claims by this Wiki and is in contrast with the other message you posted on my wall. If the GRG is the only authority with public data, why say that it is recognized by the GRG?

As for the "trivia", people seldom remember to edit every article with this piece of information and it is already listed in the tables regarding the oldest ever, so instead of having outdated articles why not just have articles that mention the major achievements (such as becoming the WOP) and leave the lesser achievements to the tables? Here you go again. I never said the GRG was the "sole recognized authority"..it's typical of your attitude problem to "put words in the mouth of others". Other recognized authorities include GWR and the IDL.Ryoung122 (talk) 18:04, April 15, 2017 (UTC) The GRG is the only of the authorities you named that has public data (GWR has at most a top ten), so I can't see how it is an "attitude problem".