Thread:Pluto2/@comment-258494-20160814000040/@comment-31766473-20170418004207

Marco Wikkerink wrote: Pluto 2 wrote: This isn't about OR. This is about the list being for people who meet the validation standards, even if not formally validated yet. And Agnes Fenton does not come close. We should not be including claimants without anything to back it up whatsoever, otherwise, the "oldest living people" article becomes worthless due to inaccuracy. The fact is, Agnes Fenton's earliest document dates to 1993. If you want, I'll provide sources...but I suspect they won't be good enough for you. Pluto,

If only validatable or seemingly true claims were kept, the wrong impression would be given that every claim to 110+ is true. By showing that not all claims are true, it becomes evident that age verification is important and justified, as not everybody out there claiming to be 110+ is actually 110+.

As such, I would rather see that all claims to 110+ are kept. Consequently or alternatively, a list of invalidated claims (based on official sources, of course) could be created. No more pornhub it is making u more and more retarded