Talk:List of unvalidated deceased supercentenarians/@comment-24970987-20160509211807

This started off as a "personal page" that only I edited and viewed, and I was quite proud of the quality of the outcome. But if it's being likened to "illegal immigration" and the result of impatient fans, then I would recommend deleting this article altogether.

I feel that each Gerontology Wiki page should "stand tall" and be appreciated by readers as a welcome addition to the encyclopedia, instead of something that we simply have to put up with. Also, these types of lists become problematic once more than one editor is involved, which invites edit warring and arbitrary inclusions/exclusions. Sometimes, it's clear-cut, other times it's not. These names can be found in each year of birth article with the appropriate color tag anyways. Well, those are my two cents...