Talk:Bob Henry/@comment-33034960-20171230154941/@comment-25898958-20171230155843

Are we going to create articles about every 109 year-old man in history? If we have articles for 109 year-old men, what about 108 year-old men? 107? 106? Where's the cutoff? It's one thing if they are notable for reasons other than longevity or are the oldest man in their nation, but that's not the case with Bob Henry. What was so special about this particular man other than the fact he happens to be alive right at this moment? It's an example of recentist bias. Ollie231213 (talk) 15:58, December 30, 2017 (UTC)