Thread:BlazPod/@comment-258494-20191230072928/@comment-258494-20191230222335

BlazPod wrote: Please quote the second part of my response (I do not know to which response this even applies) which do you think is "incorrect and unacceptable". I would say this is a basic way of fair communication.

Where it is not quoted as to what is supposed to be "incorrect and unacceptable" and therefore no chance for me to clarify, in your opinion, the problematic part of my response(s), I have do not know what to "reconsider". Greetings BlazPod, this is the quoted material that I found offensive and counter to the purposes of the Gerontology Wiki: " Gerontology Wiki is also not GRG. The current form of articles on the Gerontology Wiki has nothing to do with what GRG will decide in the future. For now, publicly available sources are and should be the only references and they should be considered objectively and comprehensively." Actually, the Gerontology Wiki is an affiliate project of the GRG and has a lot to do with the GRG, including what the GRG will decide in the future.

That said, I also agree that Jeff Xu was out of line and I suspended him one month for violating No Original Research rules.

If you wish to offer an apology and a clarification, I may shorten your suspension.Ryoung122 (talk) 22:23, December 30, 2019 (UTC)