Thread:Ollie231213/@comment-258494-20160322181438/@comment-258494-20160619193143

Pluto2 wrote:

Ryoung122 wrote:

Pluto2 wrote: Wait, you said above that documents were ALLOWED AS CITATIONS...and now they aren't? We NEED guidelines! No one's defined what "original research" even is yet...an important issue that NEEDS addressing. "Original research" is, for the purposes of the Gerontology Wikia, material not yet published in reliable sources.Ryoung122 (talk) 18:15, June 19, 2016 (UTC)

We haven't defined "reliable sources." Don't play games. You've been told OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN what "reliable sources" are. Moreover, if you have any feeling that "maybe I shouldn't do this"...then DON'T DO IT. It really is that simple. The Gerontology Wiki is designed to be an encyclopedic repository of gerontologic knowledge, not a fancrufter's fantasy playground.Ryoung122 (talk) 19:31, June 19, 2016 (UTC)