Thread:Pluto2/@comment-258494-20160205202213/@comment-258494-20160206233824

A two-year "backlog" is normal for science...in fact, most scientific materials are "several years" behind the "current events" because material must be internally reviewed, then peer-reviewed. Clearly, you have not yet developed a concept of scientific peer review. Perhaps this is something that you can read about while blocked.

The purpose of the block is to protect the editorial content of the Gerontology Wiki.

You were advised repeatedly not to edit outside the policies and guidelines of the Gerontology Wiki, and yet you continue to do so...and not only that, you have little or no understanding or concept of why not. Unless/until your mindset changes, your editing privileges at the Gerontology Wiki will remain suspended.

Allowing the block to expire is a way to give you another chance in the future, because we all grow and change over time.

Perhaps the next time you will be prepared to follow the rules and guidelines here.Ryoung122 (talk) 23:38, February 6, 2016 (UTC)