Talk:Supercentenarian Claims (110-114)/@comment-26890527-20160510184857/@comment-25898958-20160521114831

No, it's just a place to list any claims reported on in the media. If there's nothing published in a reliable source that debunks the claim, it shouldn't be considered officially debunked.

I don't think you're getting this "no original research" thing: the point of the Gerontology Wiki is not to be a place for 110 Club users to host their own personal lists based on the research they've done, it's meant to be an encyclopaedia whose content is attributable to reliable sources.

As Robert said, if there are some doubts about a claim then I don't mind putting a question mark next to their age, but don't exlcide them altogether. Ollie231213 (talk) 11:48, May 21, 2016 (UTC)