Thread:Pluto2/@comment-1272640-20161223000558

Excuse me?

Hoar's work has all the makings of a reliable source. The Kiney article is not OR or POV - it's factual, based on Hoar's research. Hoar isn't like Hill. He's been researching the claims for literal decades, and in fact met some of these claimants in person during the 1950s. He's a historian. The entire article uses Hoar's work as a citation. Please unblock me. 