Thread:Richard Monkey/@comment-258494-20160321183109/@comment-258494-20160321214407

Richard Monkey,

You really don't seem to understand how "off" your thinking is here.

1. I already asked you to SLOW DOWN and make constructive, smaller edits, little pieces at a time. This could allow, for example, if 70% of your material is acceptable and 30% is not, then the material that's acceptable could be kept.

But, despite being asked to change your editing style, you refuse to do so.

2. Your editing philosophy is that of a "fan." Ok, I get it...Wikia is for "fans", by default. But Wikia also says that the role/purpose of the Wikia can be defined differently. The purpose of this Wikia has been defined as to be an "encyclopedia" that approximates the standards of Wikipedia, while modifying the "general notability guideline" to a guideline standard that allows for the focus to include material on supercentenarians, centenarians, and "oldest people" at a lower bar than that of Wikipedia.

However, this doesn't mean that you have carte blanche to run on here and create Original Research material, "sourcing" articles to personal fansites.

Your editing standards and your level of understanding are way below the standards I'm looking for here at the Gerontology Wiki...where, by the way, I've been a member since 2007.

3. No one asked you to come here. If you choose to return, that's up to you.

4. Because you are using your talk page unproductively, I'm also blocking your access to your talk page for a week.

Have a nice vacation! Enjoy the first week of Spring!Ryoung122 (talk) 21:44, March 21, 2016 (UTC)