Thread:Pluto2/@comment-258494-20160814000040/@comment-258494-20160815052302

Pluto2 wrote:

Ollie231213 wrote: Neither claims you make have any reliable source to back them up. She's listed as unverified. Still you fail to grasp the concept of "no original research". Ollie231213 (talk) 22:47, August 14, 2016 (UTC) This isn't about OR. This is about the list being for people who meet the validation standards, even if not formally validated yet. And Agnes Fenton does not come close. We should not be including claimants without anything to back it up whatsoever, otherwise, the "oldest living people" article becomes worthless due to inaccuracy. The fact is, Agnes Fenton's earliest document dates to 1993. If you want, I'll provide sources...but I suspect they won't be good enough for you.

What part of "unverified" do you NOT UNDERSTAND? Agnes Fenton is being listed as "UNVERIFIED". NOT "MEETING VALIDATION STANDARDS". GET IT?Ryoung122 (talk) 05:23, August 15, 2016 (UTC)