Thread:Pluto2/@comment-258494-20160317193842/@comment-1272640-20160320020622

Ryoung122 wrote: You still don't get it. If an umpire makes a bad call and you are a fan and saw things differently, tough. That's the way it is.YOU are NOT a "reliable source." As Wikipedia days, it is about "verifiability", not " truth."

Second: maybe you are focusing too much on one data-point. Guinness World Records titles gave always, from the beginning, been "until otherwise proven." And that's proven in a legal, documented sense, with the decisions made by the adjudicators, NOT you. Plus, I've noticed that you've changed your mind several times on cases such as John B. Salling. Was your research wrong the first time? Why did you change your mind?Ryoung122 (talk) 01:45, March 20, 2016 (UTC) I never changed my mind. I'd always had a hunch parts of Salling's claims were true...then more evidence supporting this surfaced.