Thread:Arthur de Moraes Silva Barbosa/@comment-258494-20191018185906

You were caught adding an improper category, "childless supercentenarians", to a man age 108.

I do wonder if you do this because you are trying to inflate your contribution stats, or do you really not understand that age 110+ is considered "supercentenarian" status, not age 108?Ryoung122 (talk) 18:59, October 18, 2019 (UTC) 