Talk:Domingo Villa Avisencio/@comment-33034960-20191214153556/@comment-27547506-20191214160141

Blaz,

if you have more questions about this case then ask it on The 110 Club, or sent me a message there, I think that this comments are not a good place for this type of converstation. But I will tell you few things here:

1. "Jxu00" is one of the researchers of Mr. Villa's case, so he knows which documents and informations have been found. Also, he was is contact with several family members. The point is, Mr. Villa never claimed that he was born in 1910, that's what some of his family members claimed. There's one reason why his age is listed as 107 in 2017, but I'll not post it here, if you want to know why, you can ask me on The 110 Club.

2. There is a reason why we added "1906" without a question mark and a source, and I think it should stay like that. Still, I need to agree that we should mention 1910 as a birthyear from the 2017 article, but I will correct it a bit, because Mr. Villa never claimed to be born in 1910, that's what few of his family members said.

This disscusion should stop here, and we should wait for the GRG and GWR to make their decision on this case.