Thread:Pluto2/@comment-258494-20170805161234/@comment-33376026-20171015203555

Ryoung122 wrote: Your comments about the Moyheddin case are contrary to the Gerontology Wiki mission, which is to be encyclopedic, objective, and scientific.

Your editorial viewpoints pushing FRINGE THEORIES is contrary to the objectives that we have at the Gerontology Wiki.

You need to take some time off and think about it.

It's super-amazing to see you claim that "precedent" doesn't mean anything when it comes to the history of age validation from a particular reason. It's more than ignorant to say that...it's willfully ignorant.Ryoung122 (talk) 16:12, August 5, 2017 (UTC) Fuck robart