Thread:Pluto2/@comment-258494-20160814000040/@comment-258494-20160817145751

Pluto2 wrote:

Ryoung122 wrote:

Coyote77-113 wrote: I think Pluto2 is right...If it's not good to don't put claims with no evidence, so Agnes and Hester needs to be removed. What makes them different? Coyote77-113,

You are young, and I respect that your viewpoint may be different, but you are missing the point, also.

It's already been decided that we would apply the higher ? mark standards to claims 115+ and for claims 110-114, we would classify as "unverified". If material suggests that the claim isn't true, it needs to be published in a reliable source before that is being reflected on the Gerontology Wiki.

Remember, the Gerontology Wiki IS INTENDED TO BE AN ENCYCLOPEDIA, NOT A PLACE WHERE RESEARCH IS CONDUCTED.Ryoung122 (talk) 05:25, August 15, 2016 (UTC) Decided without any input from the other users.

Pluto2, I have added one week to your block for the above comment.

The Gerontology Wiki was not founded so you can do whatever you want here. No one here asked you to join. You need to see your editing here as a privilege, not a right. The founders of the Gerontology Wiki decide what it's purpose is. The Gerontology Wiki was founded in 2007...nine years ago. You should show some respect. It's also patently false that the purpose of the Gerontology Wiki was decided without input from other users. Quite a few users have been involved in the executive decisionmaking. That you are not one of them is no reason for sour grapes or misstating facts. You also still haven't responded to the questions I recently asked, including: why did you remove bluelinks (working hyperlinks) to existing articles?Ryoung122 (talk) 14:57, August 17, 2016 (UTC)