Thread:Richard Monkey/@comment-40155555-20191228001942/@comment-26890527-20191228083656

The trouble is, it's already difficult enough to maintain the 107+ articles, and having an article for age 106 would just be more time-consuming. For countries such as the USA, age 106 just isn't high enough to be regularly reported on any more, so it would be nearly impossible to complete the list.

Also, consider this: Age 109 - 50% chance to reach 110

Age 108 - 25% chance

Age 107 - 12.5% chance

Age 106 - 6.25% chance

Why make an extensive list on people who have such a small chance of becoming supercentenarians? Even the age 107 article will be difficult to fully complete. So I don't think an article for 106-year-olds is the best idea. I hope you understand why.

Richard Monkey (talk) 08:36, December 28, 2019 (UTC)