Thread:CGT dk/@comment-258494-20171017152945/@comment-33454023-20171023031843

Ryoung122 wrote: CGT dk,

Please note that I consider my recent block of a new user to be appropriate as it appears he was changing case validation status without citing sources. Case validation status is among the most important safeguards here for this project...otherwise, anyone can claim any age, and then what is the purpose?

If you feel that a block needs review, if it's not a major issue, then you should say "block reviewed/block lowered", NOT "no reason for block." There's always a reason for a block. In this case, we have a new user changing a case status and not citing the sources for that status change. A block can be used not just for punishment but to protect the integrity of the project.Ryoung122 (talk) 15:29, October 17, 2017 (UTC) How about someone should shove dynamite up your ass