Thread:930310JL/@comment-258494-20161123151005/@comment-26393720-20161125224606

Ryoung122 wrote: 930310JL wrote: Ryoung122 wrote: 930310JL wrote: Some of this problem might stem from the soon to be outdated Table A, which mentions that the GRG considers the supercentenarians to be "Verified", not "Validated". Please contact the GRG to address GRG issues. This is the Gerontology Wiki.

As I already stated, the words are used interchangeably, but probably shouldn't be, due to the confusion that can result.Ryoung122 (talk) 18:39, November 25, 2016 (UTC) The Gerontology Wiki is heavily based on what the GRG says since it is considered the most reliable source. Can you see the connection? I think like a judge...like a Supreme Court justice. Whether I can "see" a conneciton or not is irrelevant. The proper thing to do, if you have an issue with the GRG, is to contact the GRG via the GRG contact us options.Ryoung122 (talk) 22:32, November 25, 2016 (UTC) This has been discussed privately and this does not concern the GRG but what this Wiki is about and from where the material comes. If the main source uses "Verified/Validated" interchangeably then it is very likely that the Wiki also will.