Thread:CGT dk/@comment-258494-20160124080348/@comment-26661818-20160125092841

Of all the lists by year of birth, only "before 1870", 1870 and 1882 was created with a "gender" column. Why? You could ask the creaters. With only one or two men on a list it was maybe thought a waste of space having the additional column. When you wrote the "Gender column" Talk:Oldest_living_people on 10 Dec 2015, I suggested using bold face for men. That you never answered, got me and some others to think it was a good idea and began using it. I did not understand why you suddenly reacted negatively on my idea, but accepted your explanation about the significance of the use of bold. And again when I tried with italics. I understand you just want that "d***" column, but if it isn't possible, can I then suggest to underline the male names?