Talk:List of male supercentenarians/@comment-33034960-20191214092132/@comment-258494-20191230072321

BlazPod, you are correct in this situation.

The Gerontology Wiki follows the Wikipedia principle of "NO ORIGINAL RESEARCH". If these online teens have so-called "inside information" on a case, THAT IS ORIGINAL RESEARCH and is therefore excluded.

What the Gerontology Wiki is supposed to be is an encyclopedia, reflecting what outside reliable sources show.

If someone has a claim that a certain case is "older" than their media-reported age, if there is no public source, then they cannot use that information.Ryoung122 (talk) 07:23, December 30, 2019 (UTC)