Talk:Antonina Partyka/@comment-27547506-20180926144419/@comment-33034960-20180927101658

My comment has nothing to do with original Dorglorg's comment but with the details in White Eeaglet's comment (reply).

In short: I would not call Gerontology Wikia "an open source". It is not, because the majority of the registered users cannot edit some articles, even some of the sc biographies. As a contributor to some sc biographies (last of Mr. Schneider) I really cannot understand why some sc biographies are "locked" and some not. What is the criterion? What is so special, for example, in Ms. Cedeno Tello's biography (and the article about her is, if we look at the content, not a complete biographical presentation) that registered users cannot edit it? I wrote a comment there but it was ignored - or at least no one reacted. Ant it is not the only case.

I know that, sadly, some articles in the Gerontology Wiki have been vandlized in the past. But how to explain the vandalization and consequently the arbitrary selection, which articles will be locked and which not? (let's focus on sc biographies).