Thread:Pluto2/@comment-1272640-20160114013212

James Henry Brett, Jr, was NOT 96. The research suggests he was born in 1859 and 101 when he died. I suspect he said 1864 and 65 in 1930 as a "round" number. Here is the research performed on this case: http://z3.invisionfree.com/The_110_Club/index.php?showtopic=12161 