Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-44816-20170119014806/@comment-258494-20170126155918

930310JL wrote: Your explanations are of a really bad quality

'''FALSE. That's a personal opinion in any instance.'''

since your claims are inconsistent.

'''FALSE. You're the one pushing using both "verified" and "validated". I've made it clear: we are going with "validated".'''

If you first say that the GRG started implementing the term "validated" a decade ago

more than a decade ago, actually

but there are tables that still use the term "verified" as of today (the 2015 version was uploaded in late 2016/ early 2017) it is bound to cause issues when people edit.

You act like you've never heard of new regulations that apply to new material moving forward, not retroactively.

I understand the difference perfectly well and am only pointing out that this controversy causes problems.

Which is why I proposed an easy solution, which you so far want to resist.

When was the last time I used the term "verified" in any edit on this wikia? I have actually had edits I made to correct the term "verified" to "validated" undone by others here because "verified" is the term that is mostly used by most users.

WRONG.

Check the 110 Club, which most of the editors come from, there the term "verified" is the most commonly used term. The most viewed tables here on this Wikia also use the term "verified". If a change from "verified" to "validated" should be made a bigger announcement of this should be made because few users actually participate in these discussion. '''This place is easy to find. If I see an editor not following the rules, I'll give them a talk-page notice.Ryoung122 (talk) 15:59, January 26, 2017 (UTC)'''