Talk:List of unvalidated deceased supercentenarians/@comment-24970987-20160509211807/@comment-258494-20160509234314

I think the problem here starts from the beginning: "personal page". The pages on the Gerontology Wiki are likened to "encyclopedia entries", not "personal pages".

That said, we can keep the article, but it needs to be adjusted to fit in line with outside reliable sources, particularly when it comes to what is an "unverified" supercentenarian.Hint: it's the opposite of "verified".Ryoung122 (talk) 23:43, May 9, 2016 (UTC)