Thread:Pluto2/@comment-258494-20160205202213/@comment-24970987-20160205232935

Pluto2 wrote: It's NOT APPROPRIATE for Ozcaro to go around removing Mathew Beard when he's a verified case. It doesn't matter whether he's an admin, my point stands - it's not acceptable to pick and choose which validated cases to accept. It's one thing to remove Lucy Hannah (whose documents support a lower age), but it's another to remove Mathew Beard (for whom the majority of evidence supports his age). No, removing Beard from the official list would be inappropriate, but I never did that. The alternative list was meant to be a reflection of what I consider to be an accurate description of chronological WOP titleholders. I made it before there were any other editors here, so I admit that it is "Ozcaro-centric". That's why I've decided to rid of it, as I said earlier today. With the GRG version being the foundation, I wanted to add new, promising cases while removing/modifying disambiguous, verified ones. As for Beard, I already explained my thoughts a few months ago in a PM. Simply put, in the pre-Robert era of GRG, the degree of scrutiny for cases weren't as high. But that's a discussion for 110 Club, not here.

ryoung122: I don't take Pluto's tone against me too personal, so I would recommend shortening to a 1-week block instead.