Talk:Potential future supercentenarians/@comment-258494-20160524002644/@comment-258494-20160524152340

Another option is to make a separate 107+ article...something like "living people reported to be 107 years old".

I already asked that we not make any individual articles on people less than 108, unless they are noted for something else (i.e., WWI veteran, oldest twin).

A lot of this has to do with maintenance and practicality. Part of the issue, however, also involves what I call the "honorable mention" effect, whereby someone 107 is more likely to be noticed in small nation than one in the USA. But that problem can be solved with national-level lists, and not having a world-level list for age 107.Ryoung122 (talk) 15:23, May 24, 2016 (UTC)