Thread:Richard Monkey/@comment-40155555-20191228001942/@comment-25898958-20191228125607

Echoing Richard Monkey's message, such an article is not a good idea because:

1. It would be very long and difficult to maintain 2. The younger you go, the less complete the reporting of the cohort becomes 3. 106 year-olds statistically have a fairly low chance of reaching 110, so much so that I don't think we can consider them to be "potential" future supercentenarians.

Ollie231213 (talk) 12:56, December 28, 2019 (UTC)