Thread:Jim1997/@comment-1272640-20160227025140/@comment-1272640-20160227030703

Jim1997 wrote: Ollie231213 wrote: Less than a day after your block expires and already you are making contentious edits and edit warring. You just can't help yourself, can you? Although I personally do not have a big issue with cases being included if they are listed as unverified, this is something which needs discussion. Particularly if we are to in to include cases like Zheng Ji which are not likely to ever be verified.

Why don't you just stay away from contentious areas like these? Make some constructive edits in different areas. Ollie231213 (talk) 03:03, February 27, 2016 (UTC) Exactly. I don't have a problem with listing cases that are likely to be true, but gaining a consensus is important, so as not to seem like someone values their opinion over other. While Ji hasn't been researched, the other three have...but some more documents are needed.