Thread:Pluto2/@comment-258494-20160625160157

I'm concerned about your tangential focus on "oldest veterans" artices. I certainly don't want to see articles on people aged 101, 102, etc.

If you are going to create articles like this, please keep only to the highest ages.

Also, I think that these kinds of things can distract from the greater good, the mission, of the Gerontology Wiki. We want this to be an encyclopedia about GERONTOLOGY...NOT A PLACE FOR TRIVIA. Supercentenarian data on the world scale helps to focus the reader on what the maximum human lifespan is. Tangents like "oldest veteran" quickly veer into human interest, not science.

So, I propose a 107+ minimum for standalone articles on "oldest veterans".Ryoung122 (talk) 16:01, June 25, 2016 (UTC) 