Thread:Pluto2/@comment-258494-20160429140221

Pluto2,

The Gerontology Wiki is not the place for original research. You have already been told that.

Your unsourced renaming of the Johanna Booyson article constitutes original research and is a violation of the Gerontology Wiki policy.

If you have evidence to support overturning 40+ years of convention, you need to apply to a reliable source and present your case.

If you cannot do that, you could at least post a link to the new information on the article talk page for review. But you did not do so. Lessons not learned. Yes, some of your contributions today were worthwhile, but others were not. You need to learn to filter. As Ollie pointed out, you are creating messes that we have to clean up. It's better to block you until you learn.Ryoung122 (talk) 14:02, April 29, 2016 (UTC) 